Leader Analysis Paper #2

Posted on September 27, 2024
Leader Analysis Paper #2

Leader Analysis Paper #2

For Leader Analysis Paper #2, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:

1.   Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Communication and Leadership (Unit 4), Recognizing and Leveraging Organizational Culture and Climate (Unit 5), and Developing High Performing Teams  (Unit 6). Please include citations and references to Units 4, 5, and 6 reading materials that support your answers.

2.  How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?

Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not accurately describe.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Applied course material to what you learned about the leader.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully applied. No improvement necessary
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not apply course material.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Used citations from the week's reading materials.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not cite appropriately.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Wrote with sufficient detail.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not provide sufficient detail.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Used appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.
 
3 pts
Accceptable
Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not use appropriate writing style.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Total Points: 25
 

 

Disclaimer

The assignment sample provided by Assignments Consultancy is a previously completed work for another student and contains plagiarism. It is being shared only as a reference or guideline to help you understand how to structure and approach your own assignment. We do not recommend submitting it directly as your own work. You are solely responsible for ensuring the originality and integrity of the assignment you submit, and we advise using this sample only as inspiration while adhering to your institution's academic policies.

Solution

LEAVE A COMMENT

Comment Box is loading comments...