HU14 MGMT 560 Leader Analysis Paper #1 KA1

  • Home
  • Sample
  • HU14 MGMT 560 Leader Analysis Paper #1 KA1
Posted on September 27, 2024
HU14 MGMT 560 Leader Analysis Paper #1 KA1

Leader Analysis Paper #1

During this course, you will have the opportunity to select a leader to analyze in terms of each addressed topic.  In order to do so, you will need to identify a leader for which there is substantial information about his or her leadership style, traits and behaviors in order for you to conduct a review and analysis of his or her leadership competencies.

On Units 3, 6, 9, and 13 you will be asked to respond to various questions about your particular leader and draw correlations between your leader and what you have learned.  For this week’s paper (Leader Analysis Paper #1) you will focus on how your leader did (or did not) display aspects of Fundamentals of Leadership (Unit 1), Emotional Intelligence (Unit 2), and Effective Thinking (Unit 3). You will need to cite your conclusions with references from the week’s reading material.  

Your choice of leader will need to be approved by the instructor.  If, at any point, you find that you do not have enough material to continue your evaluation of this particular leader, you may change to a different leader but only with the approval of your instructor.

For Leader Analysis Paper #1, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:

1.  Who is your leader and what leadership role/s has this person had?

2.  What is your interest in this leader?  Why do you want to choose this person?

3.  What preliminary comprehensive sources have you found to support your weekly research?  In other words, do you have sufficient materials and references to continue to assess and analyze this person and his/her leadership style, traits and behaviors throughout this course?

4.  Application, citations and references to Units 1, 2, and 3 reading materials. Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Fundamentals of Leadership (Unit 1), Emotional Intelligence (Unit 2), and Effective Thinking (Unit 3).

See the Grading Rubric below. 

Rubric

HU14 MGMT 560 Leader Analysis Paper #1 KA1
HU14 MGMT 560 Leader Analysis Paper #1 KA1
Criteria Ratings Pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCRIT 0.1e Source Interpretation
CRIT 0.1e Interpret Sources
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Interpret sources of error, false assumptions, contradictions and inconsistencies in language, data, images, or symbols and discuss the possible intent and consequences of how the information might be interpreted.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Interpret sources of error, false assumptions, contradictions and inconsistencies in language, data, images, or symbols.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Describe sources of error, false assumptions, contradictions, or inconsistencies in language, data, images, or symbols.
 
1 pts
Novice: Identify sources of contradictions or inconsistencies in language, data, images, or symbols.
 
--
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCRIT 0.2a Key Concept
CRIT 0.2a Work with Key Concept
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Work with key concepts/information/process/theory related to a given topic and conduct a thorough analysis by doing five or more of the following: applying or extending them to new predictions, recognizing hidden meanings, drawing inferences, analyzing patterns and component parts, and communicating contrasts and comparisons.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Work with key concepts/information/process/theory related to a given topic by identifying patterns, interpreting challenging concepts, drawing logical conclusions, explaining component parts, and potential applications or extensions to new problems or contexts.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Work with key concepts/information/processes/theories related to a given topic by distinguishing key elements, illustrating relationships between concepts, describing key information generally, and inferring the importance of specific elements.
 
1 pts
Novice: Work with key concepts by relating or comparing them.
 
--
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMM 0.2 Content
COMM 0.2 Develop Content
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Use appropriate and relevant content to illustrate the subject, convey the writer's understanding, develop and advance ideas and ramifications, and shape the whole work.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Use appropriate and relevant content to develop and advance ideas and shape the whole work.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Use appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas in most of the work.
 
1 pts
Novice: Use appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in the work.
 
--
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMM 0.5 Grammar-Mechanics
COMM 0.5 Control Grammar-Mechanics
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Use language that communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency and that is substantially error-free.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Use language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity and has few errors.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Use language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors.
 
1 pts
Novice: Use language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.
 
--
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePMGT 3.1 Project Management Comm
PMGT 3.1 Integrate project management communication strategies and stakeholder management processes.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Created coordinated Communication Management and Stakeholder Management Plans as part of a PMP. Elements of the two plans appear throughout the submitted PMP with synthesized detailed information. Justified rationale supported by current literature and best practices appeared in the two plans.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Created coordinated Communication Management and Stakeholder Management Plans as part of a PMP. Integrated strategies and processes include: The communication management plan successfully synthesizes inputs from the project management plan, the project charter, enterprise environmental factors, organizational process assets, and any additional project artifacts (e.g., stakeholder register, requirements documentation, etc.) to produce a complete and coherent plan to manage information flow throughout the project's lifecycle; The stakeholder management plan successfully synthesizes inputs from the project management plan, the project charter, legal agreements, enterprise environmental factors, organizational process assets, and any additional project artifacts (e.g., project schedule, risk register, stakeholder register, etc.), to produce a complete and coherent plan to manage stakeholders throughout the project's lifecycle; The communications management plan and stakeholder management plan are free of contradictions and unnecessary redundancies.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Created coordinated Communication Management and Stakeholder Management Plans as part of a PMP. Elements of the two plans appear throughout the submitted PMP with detailed information. Continue striving toward the inclusion of all required strategies and processes with synthesized inputs.
 
1 pts
Novice: The PMP must include all elements outlined in the Proficient performance level. Missing features and the necessary details for the two required plans call for further development. Continue advancing the synthesis supported information.
 
--
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePMGT 3.2 Ethical Cultural Awareness
PMGT 3.2 Demonstrate ethical and cultural awareness in leading teams.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Advanced: Demonstrated negotiating skills supported by current literature when presenting solutions or leading a diverse team through a complex project faced with ethical or cultural issues.
 
3 pts
Proficient: Demonstrated intellectual awareness of ethical or cultural issues from more than one worldview when managing team members of a complex project.
 
2 pts
Emerging: Demonstrated awareness of their worldview's intellectual perspectives of the team's ethical or cultural issues appeared throughout the submitted content.
 
1 pts
Novice: The submitted content recognized the team's basic and obvious ethical or cultural issues. Achieving proficiency requires grasping the group's interrelationship and the project's complexity from multiple perspectives.
 
--
Accurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not accurately describe.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Applied course material to what you learned about the leader.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully applied. No improvement necessary
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not apply course material.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Used citations from the week's reading materials.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not cite appropriately.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Wrote with sufficient detail.
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
 
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not provide sufficient detail.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Used appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style
 
 
 
5 pts
Excellent
Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.
 
4 pts
Good
Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.
 
3 pts
Accceptable
Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.
 
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.
 
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not use appropriate writing style.
 
0 pts
No marks
 
5 pts
Total Points: 25

OrderID__101361.docxOrderID__197186.pdfOrderID__190781.pdfOrderID__164625.pdfOrderID__101452.pdfOrderID__135866.docxOrderID__141405.docxOrderID__62976.rmdOrderID__166960.docxOrderID__132969.docxOrderID__5114.docxOrderID_1665155765_d722883b7f773d7f945a5429b5fba588.docxOrderID__89430.docxOrderID__146521.pdfOrderID_1663700966_2c9c767846109ad102c33224af83e2a2.htmlOrderID_1664037417_9aeda4e539a5a1ac49fb9ebf2190e2c1.docxOrderID__7903.pdfOrderID__106571.pptxOrderID__192671.docx

Disclaimer

The assignment sample provided by Assignments Consultancy is a previously completed work for another student and contains plagiarism. It is being shared only as a reference or guideline to help you understand how to structure and approach your own assignment. We do not recommend submitting it directly as your own work. You are solely responsible for ensuring the originality and integrity of the assignment you submit, and we advise using this sample only as inspiration while adhering to your institution's academic policies.

Solution

LEAVE A COMMENT

Comment Box is loading comments...